Perversions, in a broad sense, are deviations from what is considered normal, natural, or morally acceptable. This can apply to a wide range of behaviors, beliefs, or practices. The term often carries a negative connotation, implying a distortion or corruption of something originally pure or healthy. In a narrower context, perversions can refer to atypical sexual practices or desires that stray from conventional sexual norms, or can describe distorted applications of a concept. The evaluation of perversions often depends on the context, cultural norms, and individual perspectives. What is considered a perversion varies across societies and through time, making the concept inherently subjective.
Perversions meaning with examples
- The psychologist studied the patient's reported 'perversions,' aiming to understand the root causes of his unusual behaviors and explore how they might be causing internal turmoil. She worked to disentangle his experiences, which were a mix of childhood trauma and what he called a natural evolution of thought.
- Some religious groups condemn certain sexual practices as perversions, citing biblical texts to support their arguments. These groups often work on changing laws to reflect their moral stance. These laws usually criminalize consensual acts between adults, while failing to address broader societal problems.
- Critics argued that the artist's work was a perversion of classical art, defiling its principles through the use of surreal and grotesque imagery. The artist's intentional distortion of the medium sparked passionate debates among viewers about aesthetics and its value.
- Political commentators warned against what they saw as a perversion of democracy, where propaganda and misinformation were used to manipulate public opinion. They were worried that voter apathy and misinformation could lead to tyranny as they were able to sway the masses.
- The historian described the regime's use of power as a perversion of justice, where the legal system was manipulated to punish political opponents. They said that this was an intentional subversion of justice, making the system illegitimate and the leaders corrupt.