Describing a system or practice where resources, opportunities, or positions are distributed based on loyalty or support given to a specific individual or political party rather than merit or qualifications. This system often involves an exchange of favors, where patronage providers offer benefits (jobs, contracts, influence) in return for political or financial support. It prioritizes personal relationships and allegiance over objective standards, potentially leading to corruption, inefficiency, and a lack of qualified individuals in key roles. The system often lacks transparency and accountability.
Patronage-based meaning with examples
- The new government vowed to eliminate the patronage-based hiring practices that had plagued the previous administration, promising a shift toward a merit-based system. The former leaders filled all the department spots with those who donated to their election campaign; this was perceived by the public as unfair. The new bill aimed to root out corruption, and hopefully eliminate unfair employment practices that had harmed the overall economy.
- Critics argued that the city's contract allocation was heavily patronage-based, with businesses tied to the mayor's political circle receiving preferential treatment. Many contracts were improperly awarded. This created inefficiencies in government spending. Instead of the best price, the government was always getting the highest priced, most unqualified workers to fill the role. The result was massive cost overruns.
- The company's success was increasingly reliant on patronage-based deals, where personal connections outweighed the quality of their products. This practice caused poor product design, and customer dissatisfaction. The company lost a great deal of respect, and fell from grace, being deemed as untrustworthy. Their lack of innovation caused them to lose their place in the market and to fail in the industry.
- Historians have documented numerous examples of patronage-based governance throughout history, where powerful families and individuals controlled access to positions of authority. These historical records are a valuable resource. It enables us to learn from past mistakes. This provides an important guide on how to act ethically in all matters of governance, in both private and public sectors. Accountability is seen as a significant factor to keep in mind.
- The development project was delayed because decisions were made in a patronage-based manner, rather than according to the standard project plan. This resulted in chaos, missed deadlines, and budget overruns. This type of behavior is indicative of a serious lack of discipline, and proper oversight. The outcome could potentially be a failure to deliver the product on schedule and on budget. The resulting chaos required a massive effort to regain control.