Describing something that is not related to or characteristic of academic or scholarly pursuits; lacking the rigorous methods, detailed research, critical analysis, or specialized knowledge typically associated with formal education and academic disciplines. It often refers to content, activities, or approaches that are meant for a general audience, prioritizing accessibility and entertainment over in-depth investigation or complex argumentation. This can include popular media, informal discussions, recreational pursuits, or work not within academia. non-scholarly work often prioritizes simplicity, opinion, and general accessibility, which can sometimes be at the expense of complexity and precise truth.
Non-scholarly meaning with examples
- The magazine published a non-scholarly article on ancient Egypt, focusing on entertaining stories rather than citing academic sources or delving into nuanced historical debates. The article aimed to engage a broad audience, relying on vivid imagery and accessible language to spark interest. The tone of the article was lighthearted and made broad statements, unlike an academic work. There was little mention of current scholarship or academic debate.
- Their discussions revolved around the latest movie releases. The group's non-scholarly conversations never touched upon the technical aspects of filmmaking or film analysis, nor did they analyze social meanings. They only discussed personal preferences and overall plot points, demonstrating an interest in entertainment rather than critical examination. The conversations were superficial and aimed to share opinions.
- The website features non-scholarly recipes and DIY projects, catering to a casual audience seeking practical advice and entertainment. The site's content is easily digestible and emphasizes user-friendliness over scientific accuracy or rigorous testing of ingredients or methods. While easy to follow, the projects are created for fun and leisure rather than for academic research.
- He presented a non-scholarly viewpoint on the topic, expressing his personal opinions based on personal experiences instead of offering data or supporting evidence. He preferred anecdote and sentiment over objective analysis. He was invited to the panel to share his opinions and perspectives from personal observation, not because of his educational qualifications or field knowledge.