The term "non-revisable" describes something that cannot be altered, amended, or changed after a specific point or condition is met. This inflexibility suggests a finality or immutability. The reasons for this lack of revision could stem from legal constraints, technical limitations, pre-established agreements, or the completion of a process that renders any alterations impractical or impossible. It emphasizes a point of no return, indicating that any modifications are forbidden or ineffective. Essentially, a non-revisable item or action is considered fixed and unchangeable in all respects, regardless of any potential future improvements or changes to circumstances.
Non-revisable meaning with examples
- The terms of the contract were clearly defined and marked as non-revisable once both parties signed it. Any attempt to modify the clauses would render the contract invalid, and could open the door to litigation. The deadline passed and no adjustments could be negotiated or made, thereby preventing legal headaches for both sides of the agreement. The non-revisable nature was critical for the contract's enforcement.
- The software's code, after the release of a new version, became non-revisable to ensure compatibility with existing installations. Further updates or modifications would destabilize the system and leave many customers vulnerable and unable to access previous functionality. Backwards compatibility and user experience were more valuable than introducing new features, which is why they were chosen in favor of a non-revisable code set.
- After the final exam was submitted, the answers and their score became non-revisable. Re-evaluating answers would be unfair to all students who submitted on time, and would be impossible to accurately and efficiently process. Any requests for a grade change could not be honored under any circumstances to maintain fairness and academic integrity.
- The judge's sentencing of the defendant was declared non-revisable after the trial had concluded. Any appeals were not relevant as the court believed that the verdict had been accurately reached. The defendant would be unable to reduce his sentence once this conclusion was reached as it would prevent the judicial system from proceeding with its business.