Emotion-driven describes actions, decisions, or behaviors primarily guided by feelings rather than logic, reason, or objective facts. It signifies a state where emotional responses significantly influence choices, often leading to impulsive, reactive, or subjective outcomes. It suggests a prioritization of the immediate emotional experience, potentially at the expense of long-term consequences or rational considerations. This can manifest in various contexts, from personal relationships to professional settings, and can be both a positive and negative force depending on the specific circumstances and the nature of the emotions involved.
Emotion-driven meaning with examples
- Her emotion-driven outburst at the meeting was fueled by years of accumulated frustration and resentment, resulting in a dramatic scene that disrupted the planned discussions. While the outburst was understandable given her history, it ultimately hindered the group's progress and damaged her professional reputation. Her strong feelings overwhelmed her capacity for rational communication. Her feelings caused a lack of control and composure, affecting her ability to be effective.
- The marketing campaign's success was partially attributed to its emotion-driven advertising strategies, which employed storytelling and imagery designed to evoke empathy and inspire a deep emotional connection with the target audience. By tapping into the audience’s desires, hopes, and fears, the campaign generated significant consumer engagement and improved brand loyalty. The campaign was a powerful blend of art and psychology, influencing consumer behavior.
- The judge ruled that the defendant's emotion-driven plea for leniency, while deeply moving, could not outweigh the overwhelming evidence against him, demonstrating that the legal system places emphasis on facts and evidence over feelings in certain situations. The focus of the trial was primarily on the facts, as that holds precedence. The judge felt sympathy for the defendant, but must focus on the facts that presented the case.
- After a long and complex negotiation process, the board made an emotion-driven decision to accept the merger deal, largely driven by the CEO's fear of failure and the desire for immediate financial gain. Although the deal provided quick wins, a more measured and objective analysis of the long-term financial implications would have been ideal. While the short term gain was the ultimate goal, the CEO acted from a lack of clear reasoning and objective facts.