Ar. represents 'Argument', a concise statement offered to support a claim or proposition. It signifies a reasoned attempt to persuade or convince someone of the truth or validity of an assertion. 'Ar.' often functions as a placeholder or abbreviation, particularly in academic or legal contexts, to direct the reader's attention to the supporting rationale or justification provided. This can encompass data, evidence, logic, and premises that underpin the central claim. Evaluating an 'Ar.' involves assessing the strength of its supporting elements and their relevance to the claim made.
Ar. meaning with examples
- The professor marked 'Ar.' next to several sentences in the student's essay. The student needed to expand on the argument, providing more evidence. The instructor wanted more data or support for claims made to improve the 'Ar.' presented. She needed to clarify the link between the evidence and the thesis for a stronger overall essay. 'Ar.' here pointed out the need for proof.
- In the courtroom, the lawyer presented a detailed 'Ar.' to the jury. The lawyer used witness testimonies and forensic evidence to support the claims made. She wanted the jury to accept her interpretation of the events. The goal was to demonstrate a clear link between the evidence and the defendant's guilt. The opposing team will try to undermine the 'Ar.'.
- During the debate, the candidate articulated a compelling 'Ar.' for his proposed policies. The candidate's speech included statistics, historical examples, and reasoned analysis. These supported his views on the need for specific changes. The effectiveness of the 'Ar.' could sway undecided voters. He used persuasive language in the 'Ar.' to make it appeal.
- The research paper included a complex 'Ar.' about climate change impacts. The 'Ar.' included many detailed scientific studies and models to back up the information. The paper's conclusion emphasized the urgency of action and the importance of policy changes. The strength of the 'Ar.' influenced scientific peer review. The 'Ar.' supported the claims made.
- In the philosophy class, the students examined different types of 'Ar.' structures. Students learned about deductive, inductive, and abductive approaches. They analyzed the validity and soundness of each method. The goal was to formulate their own effective arguments. Critiquing someone else's 'Ar.' was a challenge.